
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Nathan Sawaya

Thursday, March 25, 2010
A Need for Social Change
Jacob Rii’s used photography to “illuminate the horrid details of grim poverty: dirt, trash, peeling paint, and the starkness of having nothing” (219). He was not concerned with the detail or the sharpness of a picture, but instead; he wanted his
pictures to reveal problems in order to make the unseen visible. This way, his audience would feel the responsibility to act. Rii’s did not feature the subjects face front on, he captured them in action to expose their true facial expression. Rii’s began giving lectures and pairing his photos with words demonstrating “that photographs, in combination with words, coul
d directs social activity.

Taking a look at his photo of these three children he reveals an ignored reality for so many. The boys look sad, cold and maybe even hungry. If Rii’s were to use this photograph in a lecture or publication the words would create a “photo story.”
While Rii’s presented the need for social change, through his candid photographs, Hine begged to reform child labor. His photographs were far from candid. The subject

with words “directed viewers to a premeditated conclusion. So, when examining this photo it is easy to side with his opinion.
Both Rii and Hine constructed social change and reforms by using the camera and text to express societies need for change.
Friday, March 5, 2010
Analyzing John Berger's "Appearances"

When a picture is taken it stops time:
Before the picture Picture taken After the picture
------------------------------O---------------------------------à
The dotted line represents our imagination of before and after the picture. For instance, for someone who does not know these five girls they would probably image the time before this picture as the good life and something extremely funny was said. Since there is not much to base the actual time period of the photograph on, one would probably ponder what was so finny. To someone who does not know these girls the photograph would be ambiguous but they could still have some sort of emotional connection to it. This is because we have a primal instinct to make meaning with our eyes. Berger explains: “We must take literally what vision teaches us” (116). We normally look at a photograph and immediately distill some sort of meaning. When the viewer begins viewing the photograph he would probably describe and interpret it. Stating:
-There are five girls, three blondes and two brunettes.
-They all have long hair and are laughing at something, but that something is ambiguous. -They are sitting on something like a couch because they are all seated lower than the picture and lamp behind them.
-It looks as though one of the middle girls said something funny because they are the ones looking at each other, maybe an inside joke? Or maybe they were all watching something in front of them that was funny because they are all seated facing the same direction.
-It looks like these five girls are friends and have probably been friends for quite some time.
While describing and interpreting the photograph the viewer begins to realize the picture has a sense of language. This is because he and anyone else in the universe can connect emotionally to it. Everyone knows what it is like to laugh with friends. We have all experienced the emotion and feeling of comfort when we are surrounded by people who care about us. The photograph is universal because it relate to anyone. While the picture does have a portion of language the facial and body expression of the girls along with a quote or caption would create a sense of a narrative to/about the photograph.
If I were to change roles and say the viewer knew these five girls, or was one of these five girls everything explained would change. The diameter of the circle would expand along with the viewer’s knowledge of before and after the picture was taken. The viewer would be able to interpret the picture and have a solid emotional connection to it. This image becomes a particular image because it is a wash of history to the people who knew the girls along with the girls in the photo.

Photography is complex, a notion of history and an interpretation. Whether someone knows the people in the photograph or doesn’t they are still apt to have an emotional connection with the picture. There are normally universal connections to every photo along with particular ones for personal pictures. Pictures create some sort of meaning and language they have their own personal narrative or way of speaking and explaining this controversial world around us.
Tuesday, February 23, 2010
Is it War?

Wednesday, February 17, 2010
Gertrude Kasebier toward Modernism
